Targeting doctrine alignment for a partner air force
Twelve-week engagement to align a partner-nation national targeting doctrine to AJP-3.9, with implementing SOPs and a doctrine-trained instructor cohort.
Authoring, reviewing and operationalising NATO doctrine — AJP-3.9 and the AIntP series — for partner nations and joint commands. We translate doctrine into deployable workflows that staff can actually execute under time pressure.
Doctrine that nobody uses is not doctrine. We treat every doctrine engagement as a workflow design problem: what decision must this enable, who executes it, under what time pressure, and with what audit trail.
Drafting moves from a problem-centric framing — what threshold judgements does this doctrine support — to the structural design of the publication itself, then to the implementing SOPs that staff will actually open during operations.
We work in NATO idiom and UK English, and we always cross-reference with the relevant AIntP and AJP publications. National additions are presented as additions, not as substitutes.
Twelve-week engagement to align a partner-nation national targeting doctrine to AJP-3.9, with implementing SOPs and a doctrine-trained instructor cohort.
Three SOPs covering collection management, fusion-cell working, and the interface to the targeting board — written, tested and signed off through one tabletop exercise series.
Curated reference library and cross-reference set linking AIntP-3, -14 and -16 to a partner-nation intelligence school’s teaching publications.
Walk through the methodology, the demonstrator, and the tooling against a scenario of your choosing. We respond within two working days.